Final judgment revisited

Paterson, Alan (2015) Final judgment revisited. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 21 (1). ISSN 2059-0881

Full text not available in this repository.Request a copy

Abstract

Not many authors have the good fortune to have their work examined by their peers in a special issue of a journal to which they themselves are permitted to contribute. I have been doubly fortunate in the calibre of the commentators and the strength of their contributions. By the time I had completed Final Judgment it was already clear that decision-making in the Supreme Court had departed significantly from the practice in the House of Lords. Teamwork had arrived – evidenced by more meetings before and especially, after, the hearings, and many more exchanges between the Justices. These changes brought unintended consequences: a loss of transparency in the Court, an exacerbation of power differentials between the Justices and ambiguities over the utility of the power to dissent. In this short piece I explore these developments and what has happened in the two years since the manuscript was completed.

ORCID iDs

Paterson, Alan ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5885-0743;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)