Picture of boy being examining by doctor at a tuberculosis sanatorium

Understanding our future through Open Access research about our past...

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the Centre for the Social History of Health & Healthcare (CSHHH), based within the School of Humanities, and considered Scotland's leading centre for the history of health and medicine.

Research at CSHHH explores the modern world since 1800 in locations as diverse as the UK, Asia, Africa, North America, and Europe. Areas of specialism include contraception and sexuality; family health and medical services; occupational health and medicine; disability; the history of psychiatry; conflict and warfare; and, drugs, pharmaceuticals and intoxicants.

Explore the Open Access research of the Centre for the Social History of Health and Healthcare. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Image: Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust. Wellcome Collection - CC-BY.

The use of visual feedback in upper limb stroke rehabilitation : a pilot randomized controlled trial

Jones, Lucy and van Wijck, Frederike and Grealy, Madeleine and Rowe, P J (2015) The use of visual feedback in upper limb stroke rehabilitation : a pilot randomized controlled trial. In: The European Stroke Organisation - Annual Conference, 2015-04-17 - 2015-04-19.

Full text not available in this repository. Request a copy from the Strathclyde author


Background and objectives: For a significant proportion of stroke survivors arm function is limited. Visual feedback (VF) using 3D motion capture may enhance understanding of correct movement patterns and encourage motor relearning, however clinically this is predominantly limited to gait analysis laboratories. This study assessed the feasibility and preliminary effects of 3D VF of upper limb movement during stroke rehabilitation. Methods: Adults within 3 months of stroke onset and with limited arm function consented to being recruited into a pilot RCT consisting of: (1) an Intervention Group (IG) receiving additional upper limb therapy with VF, (2) a dose-matched Placebo Group and (3) a Control Group receiving standard care only. Additional therapy was 12 one-hour sessions over six weeks in a community-based setting. Measures evaluated the feasibility (adverse events and drop-out rates) and outcomes (Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), 9 Hole Peg Test (9HPT), Stroke Impact Scale, (SIS)). Results: Eleven of 72 (15%) participants screened were recruited. No adverse events observed and only one drop-out from IG. No participants received all 12 sessions although non-attendance was lowest in IG. Functional improvement (ARAT) was seen across all groups immediately post intervention although dexterity remained reduced (9HPT). Those in IG reported the greatest increases in function (SIS). [Low numbers prevent significance testing] Conclusions: VF in upper limb stroke rehabilitation is feasible. Preliminary outcomes suggest it may improve gross movement but has less impact on dexterity, limiting fuller functional recovery. Further modifications are required to optimize the intervention before embarking on a larger RCT.