Electromagnetic navigation in total knee arthroplasty—a single center, randomized, single-blind study comparing the results with conventional techniques

Tools

Blyth, Mark J.G. and Smith, Julie R. and Anthony, Iain C. and Strict, Neville E. and Rowe, Philip J. and Jones, Bryn G. (2015) Electromagnetic navigation in total knee arthroplasty—a single center, randomized, single-blind study comparing the results with conventional techniques. Journal of Arthroplasty, 30 (2). pp. 199-205. ISSN 1532-8406 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.008)

[thumbnail of Blyth-etal-JOA-2015-Electromagnetic-navigation-in-total-knee-arthroplasty]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Blyth_etal_JOA_2015_Electromagnetic_navigation_in_total_knee_arthroplasty.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 logo
Download (554kB)| Preview

Abstract

We report on the results of a randomized study (n = 200) to compare total knee arthroplasty performed using conventional instrumentation or electromagnetic computer assisted surgical technique. 92% of navigated and 85% of conventional knees were implanted within ± 3° from neutral mechanical alignment; there was no statistically significant difference between these proportions. There was also no difference in femoral or tibial rotation assessed by CT scan. At 1 year follow up there was no statistical difference between the two groups in American Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Scores, patient satisfaction, quality of life, hospital length of stay, complication rates or other adverse events. Tourniquet time in the navigated group was longer. Proving value for navigation in total knee arthroplasty surgery remains a challenge.

ORCID iDs

Blyth, Mark J.G., Smith, Julie R., Anthony, Iain C., Strict, Neville E., Rowe, Philip J. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4877-8466 and Jones, Bryn G.;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)