Picture of smart phone

Open Access research that is better understanding human-computer interaction...

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the Department of Computer & Information Sciences, including those researching information retrieval, information behaviour, user behaviour and ubiquitous computing.

The Department of Computer & Information Sciences hosts The Mobiquitous Lab, which investigates user behaviour on mobile devices and emerging ubiquitous computing paradigms. The Strathclyde iSchool Research Group specialises in understanding how people search for information and explores interactive search tools that support their information seeking and retrieval tasks, this also includes research into information behaviour and engagement.

Explore the Open Access research of The Mobiquitous Lab and the iSchool, or theDepartment of Computer & Information Sciences more generally. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Measurement issues in the evaluation of projects in a project portfolio

Morton, Alec (2015) Measurement issues in the evaluation of projects in a project portfolio. European Journal of Operational Research, 245 (3). pp. 789-796. ISSN 0377-2217

[img]
Preview
Text (Morton-EJOR-2015-Measurement-issues-in-the-evaluation-of-projects)
Morton_EJOR_2015_Measurement_issues_in_the_evaluation_of_projects.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 logo

Download (301kB) | Preview

Abstract

A common problem in multicriteria decision analysis is how to value projects in a project portfolio. Recently, there has been some attention given to a practice whereby analysts define a value function on some criterion by setting 0 as the value of the worst project. In particular, Clemen and Smith have argued this practice is not sound as it gives different results from the case where projects are "priced out", and makes a strong implicit assumption about the value of not doing a project. Moreover, it can be shown easily that the optimal choice set is not invariant with respect to rescalings such as those induced by the addition of a new item to the choice set, hence rank reversal can occur when this procedure is used. We provide a measurement theoretic account of the phenomenon and show that whether the admissible transformations of the underlying scale are similarity or affine (or other) transformations depends on the precise details of the value model used. We also provide an axiomatic impossibility result which illustrates an incompatibility between an idea that inaction has a value of zero and the admissibility of constant scale translations. We use our analysis to comment on the view of Clemen and Smith that the baseline problem is best dealt with by assigning project-specific scores for not doing particular projects.