Picture of neon light reading 'Open'

Discover open research at Strathprints as part of International Open Access Week!

23-29 October 2017 is International Open Access Week. The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of Open Access research outputs, all produced by University of Strathclyde researchers.

Explore recent world leading Open Access research content this Open Access Week from across Strathclyde's many research active faculties: Engineering, Science, Humanities, Arts & Social Sciences and Strathclyde Business School.

Explore all Strathclyde Open Access research outputs...

Validity and reliability of an alternative method for measuring power output during six second all out cycling

Watson, Martin and Bibbo, Daniele and Duffy, Charles R. and Riches, Philip E. and Conforto, Silvia and Macaluso, Andrea (2014) Validity and reliability of an alternative method for measuring power output during six second all out cycling. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 30 (4). pp. 598-603. ISSN 1065-8483

[img]
Preview
PDF (Watson-etal-JAB2014-alternative-method-for-measuring-power-output)
Watson_etal_JAB2014_alternative_method_for_measuring_power_output.pdf - Accepted Author Manuscript

Download (416kB) | Preview

Abstract

In a laboratory setting where both a mechanically-braked cycling ergometer and a motion analysis (MA) system are available, flywheel angular displacement can be estimated by using MA. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the validity and reliability of a MA method for measuring maximal power output (Pmax) in comparison with a force transducer (FT) method. Eight males and eight females undertook three identical sessions, separated by 4 to 6 days; the first being a familiarization session. Individuals performed three 6-second sprints against 50% of the maximal resistance to complete two pedal revolutions with a 3-minute rest between trials. Power was determined independently using both MA and FT analyses. Validity: MA recorded significantly higher Pmax than FT (P < .05). Bland-Altman plots showed that there was a systematic bias in the difference between the measures of the two systems. This difference increased as power increased. Repeatability: Intraclass correlation coefficients were on average 0.90 ± 0.05 in males and 0.85 ± 0.08 in females. Measuring Pmax by MA, therefore, is as appropriate for use in exercise physiology research as Pmax measured by FT, provided that a bias between these measurements methods is allowed for.