Picture of UK Houses of Parliament

Leading national thinking on politics, government & public policy through Open Access research

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the School of Government & Public Policy, based within the Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences.

Research here is 1st in Scotland for research intensity and spans a wide range of domains. The Department of Politics demonstrates expertise in understanding parties, elections and public opinion, with additional emphases on political economy, institutions and international relations. This international angle is reflected in the European Policies Research Centre (EPRC) which conducts comparative research on public policy. Meanwhile, the Centre for Energy Policy provides independent expertise on energy, working across multidisciplinary groups to shape policy for a low carbon economy.

Explore the Open Access research of the School of Government & Public Policy. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Insight from health professionals on physical activity promotion within routine diabetes care

Matthews, Lynsay and Kirk, Alison and Mutrie, Nanette (2014) Insight from health professionals on physical activity promotion within routine diabetes care. Practical Diabetes, 31 (3). 111-116e. ISSN 2047-2897

Full text not available in this repository.Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the views of health professionals on the current and future provision of physical activity promotion within routine diabetes care. Responses were collected from participants (n=23) in two phases. An online survey (Phase 1, n=16) and semi-structured interviews (Phase 2, n=7) were used to explore the experiences of health professionals on the provision of physical activity promotion. Qualitative responses were analysed using Interpretative phenomenological analysis and categorised into themes and sub-themes. Three main themes were identified: (1) current physical activity promotion practices; (2) delivery of physical activity promotion by health professionals; and (3) future physical activity promotion. Findings demonstrated that a lack of structure for physical activity promotion and ineffective behaviour change training made physical activity promotion within routine diabetes care challenging. Health professionals struggled to prioritise physical activity within routine consultations. They were clinically driven to provide physical activity advice to patients; however, they lacked the skills to elicit significant behaviour change. Five recommendations were presented to improve physical activity promotion within diabetes care: (1) having a key member of staff responsible for physical activity promotion; (2) access to a referral route for physical activity support; (3) inclusion of diabetes-specific information in behaviour change training; (4) linking the delivery of physical activity promotion with clinical outcomes; and (5) using 'champions' to raise the profile of physical activity within the health service. Incorporation of these recommendations by health professionals and health boards may significantly improve the provision of physical activity promotion within routine diabetes care.