Picture of virus

Open Access research that helps to deliver "better medicines"...

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by the Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences (SIPBS), a major research centre in Scotland and amongst the UK's top schools of pharmacy.

Research at SIPBS includes the "New medicines", "Better medicines" and "Better use of medicines" research groups. Together their research explores multidisciplinary approaches to improve understanding of fundamental bioscience and identify novel therapeutic targets with the aim of developing therapeutic interventions, investigation of the development and manufacture of drug substances and products, and harnessing Scotland's rich health informatics datasets to inform stratified medicine approaches and investigate the impact of public health interventions.

Explore Open Access research by SIPBS. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

A million years of waiting : competing accounts and comparative experiences of hospital waiting time policy

Morton, Alec and Bevan, Gwyn (2012) A million years of waiting : competing accounts and comparative experiences of hospital waiting time policy. In: The LSE Companion to Health Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. ISBN 9781781004234

Full text not available in this repository. Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

A million years of waiting: competing accounts and comparative experiences of hospital waiting-time policy Alec Morton and R. Gwyn Bevan 1. INTRODUCTION Waiting time for hospital care is one of the most easily measured dimensions of performance of a health care system, and one of the few dimensions that patients can assess unambiguously. Perhaps for that reason, it has been one of the most contentious and politically sensitive issues in health policy in many countries (although, arguably, patients should be more worried about variations in access and outcomes). The capacity for hospital waiting times to create acute political embarrassment can be seen in the headlines from various UK national newspapers during the period 2001–02 when popular concern about waiting times was running high (see Box 6.1). As a result of the high degree of exposure of this issue, waiting times have become an issue on which everyone has an opinion. At the roughest, rawest level, it is possible to distinguish two stances in lay and policy discussions about waiting times: ● ● policy action to improve waiting times is impossible, impractical, expensive and ineffectual, and has adverse effects on other hard-to-measure dimensions of quality of care; policy action to improve waiting times is possible, practical, desirable, and may even save money. We call the former stance the ‘miserabilist stance’ and the latter stance the ‘meliorist stance’. Yet understanding the consequences of policy action requires getting beyond these stances, and understanding how and why health care systems generate waits.