Non-invasive assessment of lower limb alignment is accurate for pre-operative planning and post-operative follow up

Tools

Clarke, Jon and Picard, Frederic and Riches, Philip and Deakin, Angela (2012) Non-invasive assessment of lower limb alignment is accurate for pre-operative planning and post-operative follow up. In: CAOS UK Conference, 2012-04-19 - 2012-04-20.

[thumbnail of Non-invasive assessment of lower limb alignment is accurate for pre-operative planning and post-operative follow up]
Preview
 PDF. Filename: CAOS_2012_clinic_vs_intraop_alignment_PER_JC.pdf
Preprint
License: Unspecified
Download (27kB)| Preview

Abstract

Knee alignment is a fundamental measurement in the assessment, monitoring and surgical management of patients with OA. In spite of extensive research into the consequences of malalignment, there is a lack of data regarding the potential variation between supine and standing (functional) conditions. The purpose of this study was to explore this relationship in asymptomatic, osteoarthritic and prosthetic knees. Our hypothesis was that the change in alignment of these three groups would be different. Infrared position capture was used to assess knee alignment for 30 asymptomatic controls and 31 patients with OA, before and after TKA. Coronal and sagittal mechanical femorotibial (MFT) angles in extension (negative values varus/hyperextension) were measured supine and in bi-pedal stance and changes analysed using a paired t-test. To quantify this change in 3D, vector plots of ankle centre displacement relative to the knee centre were produced. Alignment in both planes changed significantly from supine to standing for all three groups, most frequently towards relative varus and extension. In the coronal plane, the mean±SD(°) of the supine/standing MFT angles was 0.1±2.5/−1.1±3.7 for asymptomatic (p=0.001), −2.5±5.7/−3.6±6.0 for osteoarthritic (p=0.009) and −0.7±1.4/ −2.5±2.0 for prosthetic knees (p<0.001). In the sagittal plane, the mean±SD(°) of the supine/standing MFT angles was −1.7±3.3/−5.5±4.9 for asymptomatic (p<0.001), 7.7±7.1/1.8±7.7 for osteoarthritic (p<0.001) and 6.8±5.1/1.4±7.6 for prosthetic knees (p<0.001). The vector plots showed that the trend of relative varus and extension in stance was similar in overall magnitude and direction between the groups. The similarities between each group did not support our hypothesis. The consistent kinematic pattern for different knee types suggests that soft tissue restraints rather than underlying joint deformity may be more influential in dynamic control of alignment from lying to standing. This potential change should be considered when positioning TKA components on supine limbs as post-operative functional alignment may be different.

ORCID iDs

Clarke, Jon ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4499-7183, Picard, Frederic, Riches, Philip ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7708-4607 and Deakin, Angela;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)