Metrical rules and the notion of ‘maximum’ : a reply to Derek Attridge

Fabb, Nigel (2003) Metrical rules and the notion of ‘maximum’ : a reply to Derek Attridge. Language and Literature, 12 (1). pp. 73-80. ISSN 0963-9470

Full text not available in this repository.Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/096394700301200106

Abstract

Attridge (2003) is in effect an argument against generative metrics, focusing on the notion of ‘stress maximum’. He argues that ‘stress maximum’ is inadequate on its own terms, which I will show is incorrect when we use a fuller definition (based on the original definition from Halle and Keyser, 1966). His solution is to present metre as control directly over the phonetics of the text, but I will show that metre controls metrical elements (maxima) rather than phonetic elements (stressed syllables).

Author(s):	Fabb, Nigel ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4820-7612
Item type:	Article
ID code:	39994
Keywords:	generative metrics, stress maximum, phonetics, syllables, Language and Literature, Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
Subjects:	Language and Literature
Department:	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > School of Humanities > English
Depositing user:	Pure Administrator
Date deposited:	12 Jun 2012 14:46
Last modified:	17 Jan 2020 17:08
URI:	https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/39994
Export data:

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)