Picture of boy being examining by doctor at a tuberculosis sanatorium

Understanding our future through Open Access research about our past...

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the Centre for the Social History of Health & Healthcare (CSHHH), based within the School of Humanities, and considered Scotland's leading centre for the history of health and medicine.

Research at CSHHH explores the modern world since 1800 in locations as diverse as the UK, Asia, Africa, North America, and Europe. Areas of specialism include contraception and sexuality; family health and medical services; occupational health and medicine; disability; the history of psychiatry; conflict and warfare; and, drugs, pharmaceuticals and intoxicants.

Explore the Open Access research of the Centre for the Social History of Health and Healthcare. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Image: Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust. Wellcome Collection - CC-BY.

A novel device for evaluating forces during the dynamic jar opening action—Do older and younger adults do things differently?

Carse, Bruce and Thomson, Avril and Stansfield, Ben (2011) A novel device for evaluating forces during the dynamic jar opening action—Do older and younger adults do things differently? Medical Physics, 33 (4). pp. 521-525. ISSN 0094-2405

Full text not available in this repository. Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

Package opening tasks have been identified as some of the most challenging that individuals need to perform to access food. There is little previous study of the 3D hand loading that is required to open these products.Anovel load measuring device was used to characterise torque, squeeze and compression forces during the dynamic action of jar opening for young and older adults. The current study showed that the older adults used lower squeeze forces (86.1Nvs. 95.4 N) and higher compressive forces (26.9Nvs. 25.2 N) on the jar lid than younger adults. Older adults tended to apply loading to the jar lid slower (0.038 Nm/s vs. 0.044 Nm/s) and to open the jar at a slower rate (0.84 Rad/s vs. 1.59 Rad/s) than young adults whilst using a higher proportion of their maximal grip strength (40% vs. 27%) indicating that older adults used a more cautious opening strategy. These differences suggest that a simple maximal torque test is not sufficient to characterise older adults’ abilities in relation to package opening. The loading required to open packaging should be understood to ensure that packaging design is developed to be inclusive. This is the first report of realistic complex packaging opening loading presented in the literature.