Withholding culpable homicide Ferguson v HM Advocate

Mcdiarmid, Claire (2009) Withholding culpable homicide Ferguson v HM Advocate. Edinburgh Law Review, 13 (2). 316 - 320. ISSN 1364-9809 (https://doi.org/10.3366/E1364980909001395)

Abstract

Ferguson v HM Advocate1 raises the question of withholding the culpable homicide verdict from the jury in a murder trial. It also touches upon the inference to be drawn from the use of a lethal weapon in an attack which is eventually fatal. This comment considers both of these points.

ORCID iDs

Mcdiarmid, Claire ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-6887

• Share and Export
  

  RDF+XMLBibTeXRIOXX2 XMLRDF+N-TriplesJSONDublin CoreAtomSimple MetadataReferMETSHTML CitationASCII CitationOpenURL ContextObjectEndNoteOpenURL ContextObject in SpanMODSMPEG-21 DIDLEP3 XMLData Cite XMLRIS (EndNote Online, Zotero, Ref manager, etc)RDF+N3Multiline CSV
• Item metadata

  Item type:	Article
  ID code:	29507
  Dates:	Date Event May 2009 Published
  Subjects:	Law > Law (General)
  Department:	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Strathclyde Law School > Law
  Depositing user:	Pure Administrator
  Date deposited:	21 Mar 2011 16:49
  Last modified:	11 Nov 2024 11:30
  URI:	https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/29507