Are hygiene standards useful in assessing infection risk?

White, Liza F. and Dancer, Stephanie J. and Robertson, Chris and McDonald, John, National Health Service (Funder) (2008) Are hygiene standards useful in assessing infection risk? American Journal of Infection Control, 36 (5). pp. 381-384. ISSN 0196-6553 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.015)

[thumbnail of Are_hygiene_standards_useful(1).pdf]
Preview
 PDF. Filename: Are_hygiene_standards_useful(1).pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Download (56kB)| Preview

Abstract

We monitored the surface level cleanliness of a five-bedded surgical intensive care unit (SICU) over a ten-week period in order to evaluate proposed hygiene standards.Ten environmental sites within SICU were sampled twice weekly along with collection of clinical and patient activity data. The standards designate aerobic colony counts (ACCs) >2.5cfu/cm2 from hand-touch sites and the presence of Staphylococcus aureus as hygiene failures. Nearly a quarter of 200 samples failed the standards, mostly from hand-touch sites on curtains, beds and medical equipment. The total number of fails each week was associated with bed occupancy (p=0.04), trending towards association with SICU-acquired infections (p=0.11). Environmental S.aureus was associated with the proportion of beds occupied (p = 0.02). Indistinguishable genotypes were found between patient and environmental staphylococci, with timescales supporting staphylococcal transmission in both directions. Hygiene standards based on microbial growth levels and the presence of S.aureus reflect patient activity and provide a means to risk manage infection. They also exposed a staphylococcal reservoir that could represent a more tangible risk to patients. Standards for surface level cleanliness deserve further evaluation.

ORCID iDs

White, Liza F., Dancer, Stephanie J., Robertson, Chris and McDonald, John ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7078-845X;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)