Strathprints Home | Open Access | Browse | Search | User area | Copyright | Help | Library Home | SUPrimo

Measuring the mnemonic advantage of counter intuitive and counter schematic concepts

Johnson, Claire V.M. and Kelly, S.W. and Bishop, Paul (2010) Measuring the mnemonic advantage of counter intuitive and counter schematic concepts. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10 (1-2). pp. 109-121. ISSN 1567-7095

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

The debate on the value of Boyer's (1994) minimally counter-intuitive (MCI) theory continues to generate considerable theoretical and empirical attention. Although the theory offers an explanation as to why certain cultural texts and narratives are particularly well conveyed and transmitted, amidst society and over time, conflicting evidence remains for any mnemonic advantage of minimally counter-intuitive concepts. In an effort to reconcile these conflicting results, Barrett (2008) has made a comprehensive attempt in presenting a formal system for quantifying counter - intuitiveness including a distinction between counter-intuitive and counter-schematic concepts. The present article uses this system to generate sentences containing different levels of counter-intuitiveness, and tests whether minimally counter-intuitive items show a mnemonic advantage over concepts which are more counter-intuitive or counter schematic. Results indicate that MCI concepts hold a mnemonic advantage over counterschematic and maximally counter-intuitive concepts but only for one-week delayed recall. Interference effects may have masked immediate recall effects. Yes-no recognition after one week delay showed almost 100% accuracy suggesting that availability of retrieval cues is the factor which determines the mnemonic advantage of MCI concepts.

Item type: Article
ID code: 25716
Keywords: recall, recognition, long term memory, counter intuitiveness, religion, Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cultural Studies
Subjects: Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > Psychology
Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > School of Psychological Science and Health > Psychology
Related URLs:
Depositing user: Miss Lisa McWhinnie
Date Deposited: 29 Jun 2010 11:23
Last modified: 27 Mar 2014 08:57
URI: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/25716

Actions (login required)

View Item