Picture of person typing on laptop with programming code visible on the laptop screen

World class computing and information science research at Strathclyde...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde's Open Access research outputs. Strathprints provides access to thousands of Open Access research papers by University of Strathclyde researchers, including by researchers from the Department of Computer & Information Sciences involved in mathematically structured programming, similarity and metric search, computer security, software systems, combinatronics and digital health.

The Department also includes the iSchool Research Group, which performs leading research into socio-technical phenomena and topics such as information retrieval and information seeking behaviour.

Explore

Comparison of the results of 4 users of a contemporary CADCAM system

McGarry, T. and McHugh, B. (2007) Comparison of the results of 4 users of a contemporary CADCAM system. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 31 (1). pp. 27-35. ISSN 0309-3646

[img]
Preview
PDF (strathprints015048.pdf)
strathprints015048.pdf - Accepted Author Manuscript

Download (79kB) | Preview

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the variation of measurements recorded when four different users of the Tracer CAD system trace a model of known dimensions and volume. This complements a previous study by the same authors Mc Garry and Mc Hugh, (2005) where the accuracy and consistency of a single user was measured. Landmarks were added to indicate proximal, distal, anterior, medial and lateral regions of a specially manufactured cylindrical nylon 6.6 model. Four circumferential lines were added at regular intervals along the length of the cylinder with a view to calculating diameters and volumes relative to these landmarks. The model was measured using a comparator with guaranteed accuracy to one hundredth of a millimetre, and was traced using the Tracer CAD system by four different users. The difference in mean volume between measured results and Tracer CAD scans of differing users ranged to -3%. Individual trace volumes varied by up to -7.85%. In all volumes measured, eleven out of twelve maximum volume percentage differences measured greater than 2 %, and of these, seven results showed maximum volume percentage difference to measure greater than 4%.