What do I not know? How does AI affect 'critical' thinking?

Weaver, Beth and Gillon, Fern and Belton, Ian and Heron, Gavin (2026) What do I not know? How does AI affect 'critical' thinking? Criminology and Criminal Justice. pp. 1-23. ISSN 1748-8958 (https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958261453600)

[thumbnail of Weaver-etal-CCJ-2026-How-does-AI-affect-critical-thinking]
Preview
Text. Filename: Weaver-etal-CCJ-2026-How-does-AI-affect-critical-thinking.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo

Download (199kB)| Preview

Abstract

Effective and ethical risk assessment in criminal justice depends on practitioners’ critical thinking and professional curiosity, yet both are constrained by structural, relational and emotional pressures. The rapid proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) introduces new opportunities and challenges in probation practice. Drawing on data from 16 practitioners who participated in exploratory, interactive workshops, this study examined how practitioners engaged with ChatGPT when completing an actuarial risk assessment, and how these interactions influenced their critical thinking. Participants identified potential benefits, including reduced cognitive load through idea generation, support in articulating justifications, and assistance in structuring complex information. However, they also highlighted risks, particularly the potential for cognitive offloading, over‑reliance on AI outputs, and diminished critical scrutiny in contexts characterised by time pressure and uncertainty. The article discusses these preliminary findings in relation to wider debates on human–AI interaction and the conditions under which LLMs may augment, or undermine, professional judgement.

ORCID iDs

Weaver, Beth ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-1068, Gillon, Fern ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0994-4000, Belton, Ian ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2479-6563 and Heron, Gavin ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2238-1532;