Tocilizumab versus sarilumab among adults hospitalised with COVID-19 : target trial emulation across England and Scotland
Zheng, Bang and Kurdi, Amanj and Amstutz, Alain and Green, Amelia and Herrett, Emily and Tazare, John and Wen, Qing and Mahalingasivam, Viyaasan and Smith, Rebecca and MacKenna, Brian and Mehrkar, Amir and Bacon, Sebastian and Goldacre, Ben and Robertson, Chris and Sheikh, Aziz and Tomlinson, Laurie (2026) Tocilizumab versus sarilumab among adults hospitalised with COVID-19 : target trial emulation across England and Scotland. Nature Communications. ISSN 2041-1723 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73134-9)
|
Text.
Filename: Zheng-etal-NC-2026-Tocilizumab-versus-sarilumab-among-adults-hospitalised-with-COVID-19.docx
Accepted Author Manuscript Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 January 2099. Download (2MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
The interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitors tocilizumab and sarilumab have been repurposed for COVID-19 treatment. However, discrepancies still exist across global and national COVID-19 guidelines, with limited data on the comparative effectiveness between these therapeutics especially during the delta/omicron periods. With the approval of NHS England and Public Health Scotland, we compared their effectiveness among adults hospitalised with COVID-19 using electronic health records data through the OpenSAFELY-TPP (England) and EAVE II (Scotland) platforms. Following the target trial emulation framework, 10,487 patients treated between July 2021 and February 2022, when both drugs were frequently prescribed, were included. In England, 1150 (20.1%) of 5710 participants receiving tocilizumab died by day 28 compared with 820 (20.4%) of 4025 participants receiving sarilumab (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.07, 95% CI 0.96-1.19). In Scotland, 114 (29.4%) of 388 participants receiving tocilizumab died by day 28 compared with 97 (27.0%) of 359 participants receiving sarilumab (aHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68-1.23). There was no evidence of a difference in time to hospital discharge between the groups, and no credible effect modification by variant of concern, vaccination status, age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, or comorbidities. Our findings provide supportive evidence for both drugs as alternative therapeutic options in COVID-19 in-patient management.
ORCID iDs
Zheng, Bang, Kurdi, Amanj
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5036-1988, Amstutz, Alain, Green, Amelia, Herrett, Emily, Tazare, John, Wen, Qing, Mahalingasivam, Viyaasan, Smith, Rebecca, MacKenna, Brian, Mehrkar, Amir, Bacon, Sebastian, Goldacre, Ben, Robertson, Chris, Sheikh, Aziz and Tomlinson, Laurie;
-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 96186 Dates: DateEvent15 May 2026Published15 May 2026Published Online27 April 2026AcceptedSubjects: UNSPECIFIED Department: Faculty of Science > Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences
Strategic Research Themes > Health and Wellbeing
Faculty of Science > Mathematics and StatisticsDepositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 07 May 2026 08:47 Last modified: 02 Jun 2026 07:12 URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/96186
Tools
Tools





