Measuring the care needs of young people with intellectual difficulties : construct validity of the learning disability vulnerability assessment scale and utility in establish the care needs of young people

Evans, Stephen and Cooney, Gayle and Young, David and O’Donnell, Ursula and Tiffin, Paul A. (2025) Measuring the care needs of young people with intellectual difficulties : construct validity of the learning disability vulnerability assessment scale and utility in establish the care needs of young people. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. ISSN 1744-6295 (https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251392108)

[thumbnail of Evans-etal-JID-2025-Measuring-the-care-needs-of-young-people-with-intellectual-difficulties]
Preview
Text. Filename: Evans-etal-JID-2025-Measuring-the-care-needs-of-young-people-with-intellectual-difficulties.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo

Download (563kB)| Preview

Abstract

The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in children is critical to needs-related planning and risk management. Despite proliferation of measures there is limited evidence-base to support the validity of existing, relevant clinical assessments. The FACE CARAS young person’s risk assessment toolkit includes a measure of vulnerability-the Learning Disability Vulnerability Assessment Scale (LD-VAS). Good inter-rater reliability has been reported but construct validity has not previously been demonstrated. The aims of this study were to assess the construct-validity of the tool by: (i) evaluating the dimensionality of the ratings produced, and (ii) modelling the ability of the scores to quantify the care needs of young people. LD-VAS ratings were available for 143 young people, the dimensionality of the scale ratings was assessed using a parallel analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The ability of scores to predict care-level was modelled using discriminant function analysis and multinomial logistic regression. A single factor CFA model showed a good fit to the data. The discriminant function analysis suggested several scoring profiles exist, relating to care-level. On multinomial logistic regression the scores could statistically significantly differentiate between those in the lowest and higher intensity care categories. The LD-VAS appears to have construct validity and is potentially useful in supporting rational decision-making regarding care-provision for children affected by learning disability.

ORCID iDs

Evans, Stephen, Cooney, Gayle, Young, David ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3652-0513, O’Donnell, Ursula and Tiffin, Paul A.;