Thigh-worn sensor for measuring initial and final contact during gait in a mobility impaired population : a validation study

Tools

Johnson, Thomas and Kuntapun, Janeesata and Childs, Craig and Kerr, Andy (2025) Thigh-worn sensor for measuring initial and final contact during gait in a mobility impaired population : a validation study. JMIR Biomedical Engineering, 10. e80308. ISSN 2561-3278 (https://doi.org/10.2196/80308)

[thumbnail of Johnson-etal-JMIR-BE-2025-Thigh-worn-sensor-for-measuring-initial-and-final-contact-during-gait]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Johnson-etal-JMIR-BE-2025-Thigh-worn-sensor-for-measuring-initial-and-final-contact-during-gait.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (346kB)| Preview

Abstract

Background: Adapting physical activity monitors to detect gait events (ie, at initial and final contact) has the potential to build a more personalized approach to gait rehabilitation after stroke. Meeting laboratory standards for detecting these events in impaired populations is challenging, without resorting to a multisensor solution. The Teager-Kaiser energy operator (TKEO) estimates the instantaneous energy of a signal; its enhanced sensitivity has successfully detected gait events from the acceleration signals of individuals with impaired mobility, but has not been applied to stroke. Objective: This study aimed to test the criterion validity of TKEO gait event detection (and derived spatiotemporal metrics) using data from thigh mounted physical activity monitors compared with concurrent 3D motion capture in chronic survivors of stroke. Methods: Participants with a history of stroke(n=13, mean age 59, SD 14 years), time since stroke (mean 1.5, SD 0.5 years), walking speed (mean 0.93ms−1 , SD 0.38 m/s) performed two 10m walks at their comfortable speed, while wearing two ActivPAL 4+ (AP4) sensors (anterior of both thighs) and LED cluster markers on the pelvis and ankles which were tracked by a motion capture system. The TKEO signal processing technique was then used to extract gait events (initial and final contact) and calculate stance durations which were compared with motion capture data. Results: There was very good agreement between the AP4 and motion capture data for stance duration (AP4 0.85s, motion capture system 0.88s, 95% CI of difference −0.07 to 0.13, intraclass correlation coefficient [3,1]=0.79). Conclusions: The TKEO method for gait event detection using AP4 data provides stance time durations that are comparable with laboratory-based systems in a population with chronic stroke. Providing accurate stance time durations from wearable sensors could extend gait training out of clinical environments. Limitations include ecological and external validity. Future work should confirm findings with a larger sample of participants with a history of stroke. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06787768; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06787768

ORCID iDs

Johnson, Thomas ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7138-4338, Kuntapun, Janeesata, Childs, Craig ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1318-0007 and Kerr, Andy ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7666-9283;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)