The double-bind of freedom and economic security : Venezuelan “middle class” migrants in Argentina’s platform economy
Ivancheva, Mariya P. and Pla, Jesica Lorena (2025) The double-bind of freedom and economic security : Venezuelan “middle class” migrants in Argentina’s platform economy. Dialectical Anthropology. ISSN 0304-4092 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-024-09734-y)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Ivancheva-Pla-DA-2025-Venezuelan-middle-class-migrants-in-Argentinas-platform-economy.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript License:
Download (605kB)| Preview |
Abstract
This paper discusses the link between (middle) class positionality and political beliefs toward social welfare regimes through the tension between economic security and freedom and with a case study of Venezuelan migrants in Argentina’s platform economy. Since 2014, over 6.5 million Venezuelans have migrated across South America. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, when this study took place, Venezuelans arriving in Argentina are predominantly university-educated professionals. Invited by a right-wing government that promised gainful employment, they were initially presented as ‘deserving’, ‘educated’, and ‘qualified’ migrants. Landing in recession-struck Argentina, however, the majority entered jobs in the platform and gig economy as taxi, delivery, and care workers: risk-intensive precarious jobs that gained visibility as ‘essential’ during the pandemic. Against this background, the paper explores how Venezuelan ‘high-skill’ migrants’ negotiate the opposition between freedom and economic security in the shift from ‘high- ‘ to ‘low-skilled’ labour. We ask, what do their experiences tell us about the nexus between geographic and social mobility, and how do structure their political views and choices? To discuss these questions, the paper presents the findings from our fieldwork conducted among Venezuelan migrants in Buenos Aires (2020–2021). It traces if and how middle-class migrants’ self-perceptions have been challenged or reinforced by work in the platform economy undertaken as a last resort under the conditions of economic hardship, rather than out of free choice between multiple alternatives. We discuss how this situation affects the rationalisation of their situation via certain political attitudes toward socialist or free market regimes. Individual freedom of choice and market freedom are conflated, and social welfare is seen not as a universal right, but as a middle class entitlement obtained through class and/or geographic mobility. A correction to this article was published on 01 July 2025. See https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-024-09734-y for details. The original article has been corrected.
ORCID iDs
Ivancheva, Mariya P.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4066-4074 and Pla, Jesica Lorena;
-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 92852 Dates: DateEvent21 January 2025Published21 January 2025Published Online13 August 2024Accepted26 June 2024SubmittedSubjects: Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > Anthropology
Political Science > Political science (General)
Social Sciences > Economic History and ConditionsDepartment: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Strathclyde Institute of Education > Education Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 15 May 2025 10:45 Last modified: 11 Aug 2026 05:04 Related URLs: URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/92852
Tools
Tools






