Revise and resubmit? : Peer reviewing business historical research
Lubinski, Christina and Decker, Stephanie and MacKenzie, Niall (2024) Revise and resubmit? : Peer reviewing business historical research. Business History, 66 (4). pp. 773-792. ISSN 0007-6791 (https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2024.2325610)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Lubinski-etal-BH-2024-Revise-and-resubmit-Peer-reviewing-business-historical-research.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript License: Download (1MB)| Preview |
Abstract
Peer review in Business History has benefitted from the insights of over 550 expert reviewers over the past three years. In this editorial, we contextualise the journal’s peer review process historically and in the available literature. We discuss some of the challenges of the double-blind review system, including securing reviewer engagement amidst time constraints and publication pressure, the dark sides of anonymisation, and the role of bias, values, and interdisciplinarity in research evaluations. Based on these reflections, we furnish some concrete guidance for reviewers on how to approach business historical research. We end by contemplating the future landscape of peer review and opening a conversation about review standards and reviewer education in the field of business history. Is peer review ripe for revision and resubmit?
ORCID iDs
Lubinski, Christina, Decker, Stephanie and MacKenzie, Niall ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3769-7086;Persistent Identifier
https://doi.org/10.17868/strath.00090182-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 90182 Dates: DateEvent18 May 2024Published14 March 2024Published Online22 February 2024Accepted13 February 2024SubmittedSubjects: Social Sciences > Commerce > Business
History General and Old World > History (General)Department: Strathclyde Business School > Hunter Centre for Entrepreneurship, Strategy and Innovation Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 08 Aug 2024 09:01 Last modified: 25 Sep 2024 12:20 Related URLs: URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/90182