Birth order does not affect ability to detect kin
Fasolt, Vanessa and Holzleitner, Iris J. and Lee, Anthony J. and O'Shea, Kieran J. and Debruine, Lisa M. (2019) Birth order does not affect ability to detect kin. Collabra: Psychology, 5 (1). 35. ISSN 2474-7394 (https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.235)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Fasolt-etal-CP-2019-Birth-order-does-not-affect-ability-to-detect-kin.pdf
Final Published Version License: Download (650kB)| Preview |
Abstract
Previous studies suggest that birth order affects kinship detection ability. Kaminski et al. (2010) argued that firstborns use contextual cues (e.g., maternal perinatal association) to assess kinship in their own family, leading to a disadvantage in assessing kinship from facial cues alone in strangers. In contrast, laterborns do not have the contextual cue of maternal perinatal association and hence rely more on facial cues, leading to an advantage in detecting kin from facial cues alone. However, Alvergne et al. (2010) found no evidence in support of such a birthorder effect. The current study aimed to replicate previous studies with better suited methods to determine the effect of birth order on kin recognition. 109 raters viewed 132 pairs of photographs of children (aged 3–17 years), and indicated whether each pair was related or unrelated. Half of the pairs were sibling pairs and half were unrelated child pairs that were age- and gender- matched to the related pairs. No image was shown more than once, related pairs were not known to be related to any other image in the study, and individuals from unrelated pairs were not known to be related to any other image. We used binomial logistic mixed effects modelling to predict kinship judgments from relatedness and birth order (with image pair and rater as random factors). Relatedness was the main factor driving kinship judgments; related child-pairs were more than twice as likely as unrelated pairs to be judged as kin. Kinship judgment accuracy was unaffected by rater birth order. These findings indicate that laterborns did not have an advantage in detecting child sibling pairs. Pre-registration, data, code, and preprint available at osf.io/h43ep.
ORCID iDs
Fasolt, Vanessa, Holzleitner, Iris J., Lee, Anthony J., O'Shea, Kieran J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7587-8537 and Debruine, Lisa M.;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 89461 Dates: DateEvent2 August 2019Published23 July 2019AcceptedSubjects: Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > Psychology Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Psychological Sciences and Health > Psychology Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 04 Jun 2024 13:33 Last modified: 25 Sep 2024 14:43 URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/89461