A cross-culture, cross-gender comparison of perspective taking mechanisms
Kessler, Klaus and Cao, Liyu and O'Shea, Kieran J. and Wang, Hongfang (2014) A cross-culture, cross-gender comparison of perspective taking mechanisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281 (1785). 20140388. ISSN 0962-8452 (https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0388)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Kessler-etal-PRSB-2014-A-cross-culture-cross-gender-comparison-of-perspective-taking-mechanisms.pdf
Final Published Version License: Download (524kB)| Preview |
Abstract
Being able to judge another person's visuo-spatial perspective is an essential social skill, hence we investigated the generalizability of the involved mechanisms across cultures and genders. Developmental, cross-species, and our own previous research suggest that two different forms of perspective taking can be distinguished, which are subserved by two distinct mechanisms. The simpler form relies on inferring another's line-of-sight, whereas the more complex form depends on embodied transformation into the other's orientation in form of a simulated body rotation. Our current results suggest that, in principle, the same basic mechanisms are employed by males and females in both, East-Asian (EA; Chinese) and Western culture. However, we also confirmed the hypothesis that Westerners show an egocentric bias, whereas EAs reveal an other-oriented bias. Furthermore, Westerners were slower overall than EAs and showed stronger gender differences in speed and depth of embodied processing. Our findings substantiate differences and communalities in social cognition mechanisms across genders and two cultures and suggest that cultural evolution or transmission should take gender as a modulating variable into account.
ORCID iDs
Kessler, Klaus, Cao, Liyu, O'Shea, Kieran J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7587-8537 and Wang, Hongfang;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 89450 Dates: DateEvent22 June 2014Published4 April 2014AcceptedSubjects: Medicine > Internal medicine > Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > PsychologyDepartment: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Psychological Sciences and Health > Psychology Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 03 Jun 2024 14:15 Last modified: 29 Oct 2024 01:47 URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/89450