Round robin laboratory testing of a scaled 10 MW floating horizontal axis wind turbine

Gueydon, Sebastien and Judge, Frances M. and O’Shea, Michael and Lyden, Eoin and Le Boulluec, Marc and Caverne, Julien and Ohana, Jérémy and Kim, Shinwoong and Bouscasse, Benjamin and Thiebaut, Florent and Day, Sandy and Dai, Saishuai and Murphy, Jimmy (2021) Round robin laboratory testing of a scaled 10 MW floating horizontal axis wind turbine. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9 (9). 988. ISSN 2077-1312 (https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9090988)

[thumbnail of Gueydon-etal-JMSE-2021-Round-robin-laboratory-testing-of-a-scaled-10-MW-floating-horizontal-axis]
Preview
Text. Filename: Gueydon_etal_JMSE_2021_Round_robin_laboratory_testing_of_a_scaled_10_MW_floating_horizontal_axis.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo

Download (5MB)| Preview

Abstract

This paper documents the round robin testing campaign carried out on a floating wind turbine as part of the EU H2020 MaRINET2 project. A 1/60th scale model of a 10 MW floating platform was tested in wave basins in four different locations around Europe. The tests carried out in each facility included decay tests, tests in regular and irregular waves with and without wind thrust, and tests to characterise the mooring system as well as the model itself. For the tests in wind, only the thrust of the turbine was considered and it was fixed to pre-selected levels. Hence, this work focuses on the hydrodynamic responses of a semi-submersible floating foundation. It was found that the global surge stiffness was comparable across facilities, except in one case where different azimuth angles were used for the mooring lines. Heave and pitch had the same stiffness coefficient and periods for all basins. Response Amplitude Operators (RAOs) were used to compare the responses in waves from all facilities. The shape of the motion RAOs were globally similar for all basins except around some particular frequencies. As the results were non-linear around the resonance and cancellation frequencies, the differences between facilities were magnified at these frequencies. Surge motions were significantly impacted by reflections leading to large differences in these RAOs between all basins.