A qualitative examination of affect and ideology within mass media interventions to increase HIV testing with gay men garnered from a systematic review

Langdridge, Darren and Flowers, Paul and Riddell, Julie and Boydell, Nicola and Teal, Gemma and Coia, Nicky and McDaid, Lisa (2020) A qualitative examination of affect and ideology within mass media interventions to increase HIV testing with gay men garnered from a systematic review. British Journal of Health Psychology. ISSN 1359-107X (https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12461)

[thumbnail of Langdridge-etal-BJHP-2020-A-qualitative-examination-of-affect-and-ideology-within-mass-media-interventions]
Preview
Text. Filename: Langdridge_etal_BJHP_2020_A_qualitative_examination_of_affect_and_ideology_within_mass_media_interventions.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo

Download (1MB)| Preview

Abstract

Objectives Increasing appropriate HIV testing among men who have sex with men (MSM) is crucial to HIV prevention. Mass media interventions are effective in promoting testing, but to date, there has been little examination of their active content. Design We conducted a qualitative analysis of intervention materials (n = 69) derived from a systematic review of mass media interventions designed to improve testing with MSM. Methods Visual data were analysed for their affective and ideological content using a novel method drawing on concepts from semiotics (i.e., broadly speaking, the analysis of signs). Results Whilst affect was not explicitly theorized or examined in any of the studies, there are clearly identifiable affective elements implicitly at play in these interventions. Four thematic categories of affect/ideology were identified including (1) sexual desire and the ‘pornographication’ of the gay/bisexual male subject; (2) narratives of romance and love; (3) fear, threat, and regret; and (4) ‘flattened’ affect. Conclusions This is the first study to examine and detail the affective and ideological aspects of intervention content in this field. Using analytic techniques such as those reported here, in addition to approaches that focus on the manner in which intervention content address more proximal determinants of behaviour, can provide a rich and potentially more useful evidence base to assist with future interventions.