Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire plus arc additive manufactured (WAAM) titanium samples

Mohseni, Ehsan and Javadi, Yashar and Lines, David and Wathavana Vithanage, Randika Kosala and Foster, Euan and Qiu, Zhen and Zimermann, Rastislav and MacLeod, Charles Norman and Pierce, Stephen and Gachagan, Anthony and Marinelli, Gianrocco and Ding, Jialuo and Williams, Stewart (2019) Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire plus arc additive manufactured (WAAM) titanium samples. In: 58th Annual British Conference on Non-Destructive Testing, 2019-11-03 - 2019-11-05, Telford, UK.

[thumbnail of Mohseni-etal-ABCNDT-2019-Ultrasonic-phased-array-inspection-of-wire-plus-arc-additive-manufactured-WAAM-titanium-samples]
Text (Mohseni-etal-ABCNDT-2019-Ultrasonic-phased-array-inspection-of-wire-plus-arc-additive-manufactured-WAAM-titanium-samples)
Accepted Author Manuscript

Download (228kB)| Preview


    Recent developments in the application of the Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) process for the production of titanium components have attracted the attention of many industrial sectors, such as aerospace and defence. The utilisation of those components within these sensible sectors increased the demand for advanced and efficient inspection procedures. In order to assess the quality and integrity of titanium components deposited via WAAM, conventional ultrasonic phased array inspections together with the more advanced imaging techniques, such as total focusing method (TFM), were deployed in this study. Four titanium linear structures were analysed in the study. In particular, the first two was built using parallel deposition and containing intentional deposition defects, such as lack of fusion (LoF) and keyhole (KH) defects, and the remaining two were deposited using oscillated deposition without intentional defects. The inspections were carried out in-contact both from the machined and the original surface of the WAAM walls using 5 MHz-64 elements, 10 MHz-128 elements, and 10 MHz-32 elements linear arrays (Figure 1(a)). Two different array controllers, FIToolbox (Diagnostic Sonar, UK) and LTPA (Peak NDT, UK), were used to excite the arrays and receive echoes. The calibration was performed on a ø2 mm side-drilled hole in one of the walls. The results suggested that the best images were formed using a 5 MHz-64 elements array as demonstrated in Figures 1(b) and 1(c). Most of the intentional WAAM defects were detected in TFM images formed by a combination of arrays, stand-off wedges, phased array controllers, and TFM algorithms. Although, these defects cannot be sized properly without a calibration block made of the same material undergone the WAAM process, but the performance of phased array inspections found to be promising in inspection of titanium WAAM components.

    ORCID iDs

    Mohseni, Ehsan ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0819-6592, Javadi, Yashar ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6003-7751, Lines, David, Wathavana Vithanage, Randika Kosala ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1023-2564, Foster, Euan, Qiu, Zhen ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6219-7158, Zimermann, Rastislav, MacLeod, Charles Norman ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-9769, Pierce, Stephen ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0312-8766, Gachagan, Anthony ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9728-4120, Marinelli, Gianrocco, Ding, Jialuo and Williams, Stewart;