Picture of UK Houses of Parliament

Leading national thinking on politics, government & public policy through Open Access research

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the School of Government & Public Policy, based within the Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences.

Research here is 1st in Scotland for research intensity and spans a wide range of domains. The Department of Politics demonstrates expertise in understanding parties, elections and public opinion, with additional emphases on political economy, institutions and international relations. This international angle is reflected in the European Policies Research Centre (EPRC) which conducts comparative research on public policy. Meanwhile, the Centre for Energy Policy provides independent expertise on energy, working across multidisciplinary groups to shape policy for a low carbon economy.

Explore the Open Access research of the School of Government & Public Policy. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Reproductive politics in twentieth-century France and Britain

Olszynko-Gryn, Jesse and Rusterholz, Caroline (2019) Reproductive politics in twentieth-century France and Britain. Medical History, 63 (2). pp. 117-133. ISSN 0025-7273

[img]
Preview
Text (Olszynko-Gryn-Rusterholz-MH-2019-Reproductive-politics-in-twentieth-century-France-and-Britain)
Olszynko_Gryn_Rusterholz_MH_2019_Reproductive_politics_in_twentieth_century_France_and_Britain.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript

Download (320kB)| Preview

    Abstract

    This special issue adopts a comparative approach to the politics of reproduction in twentieth-century France and Britain. The articles investigate the flow of information, practices and tools across national boundaries and between groups of experts, activists and laypeople. Empirically grounded in medical, news media and feminist sources, as well as ethnographic fieldwork, they reveal the practical similarities that existed between countries with officially different political regimes as well as local differences within the two countries. Taken as a whole, the special issue shows that the border between France and Britain was more porous than is typically apparent from nationally-focused studies: ideas, people and devices travelled in both directions; communication strategies were always able to evade the rule of law; contraceptive practices were surprisingly similar in both countries; and religion loomed large in debates on both sides of the channel.