All-risks counter-terrorist policing

Lennon, Genevieve (2018) All-risks counter-terrorist policing. In: Counter-terrorism and Miscarriages of Justice. Hart Publishing, London. ISBN 9781509915729

[img] Text (Lennon-Hart-2018-All-risks-counter-terrorist)
Lennon_Hart_2018_All_risks_counter_terrorist.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 May 2020.

Download (505kB) | Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

    Abstract

    Since his early work, Clive Walker has recognised the key role of not only criminalisation but also ‘control’ in relation to countering terrorism. Despite the oft-repeated mantra of the primacy of prosecution, it is control that dominates contemporary counter-terrorist strategies such as CONTEST. A constant theme through Walker’s writing has been the insistence that counter-terrorist laws, while sometimes justifiably exceptional, must adhere to constitutionalism. He is one of the very few scholars who has comprehensively analysed every aspect of UK counter-terrorist law. This expansive range of inquiry has led him to analyse the workings and limitations of all UK counter-terrorist policing powers. This chapter aims to draw together these three elements – policing, control and constitutionalism – by examining Walker’s concept of all-risks policing powers.