FITNESSGRAM BMI Standards: BMI Standards: Should They Be Race-Specific?

Rowe, D.A. and Mahar, M. (2006) FITNESSGRAM BMI Standards: BMI Standards: Should They Be Race-Specific? Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3 (2). S58-S66. ISSN 1543-3080

Full text not available in this repository.Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate race-specific FITNESSGRAM® body mass index (BMI) standards in comparison to the recommended standards, i.e., percent fat (%BF) ³25 in boys and %BF ³32 in girls. Methods: BMI and %BF were estimated in 1,968 Black and White children ages 6-14 years, using methods similar to those used to develop the current FITNESSGRAM standards. Multiple regression was employed to develop age-, sex-, and race-specific BMI standards. Percent agreement and modified kappa (kq) were used to evaluate agreement with the %BF standards, and sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate classification accuracy. Concludes that Race-specific BMI standards appear to be a more accurate representation of unhealthy %BF levels than the current FITNESSGRAM BMI standards.

Creators(s):	Rowe, D.A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5249-9008 and Mahar, M.;
Item type:	Article
ID code:	5458
Keywords:	race, physical activity, fitness, health, Communities. Classes. Races, Personal health and hygiene, including exercise, nutrition , Physiology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Subjects:	Social Sciences > Communities. Classes. Races Medicine > Public aspects of medicine > Personal health and hygiene, including exercise, nutrition Science > Physiology
Department:	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > School of Psychological Science and Health > Physical Activity for Health
Depositing user:	Strathprints Administrator
Date deposited:	06 Mar 2008
Last modified:	01 Jan 2021 01:30
Related URLs:	https://www.humankinetics.com/JPAH/viewa...
URI:	https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/5458
Export data:

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)