FITNESSGRAM BMI Standards: BMI Standards: Should They Be Race-Specific?
Rowe, D.A. and Mahar, M. (2006) FITNESSGRAM BMI Standards: BMI Standards: Should They Be Race-Specific? Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3 (2). S58-S66. ISSN 1543-3080
Full text not available in this repository.Request a copy from the Strathclyde authorAbstract
The purpose of the study was to evaluate race-specific FITNESSGRAM® body mass index (BMI) standards in comparison to the recommended standards, i.e., percent fat (%BF) ³25 in boys and %BF ³32 in girls. Methods: BMI and %BF were estimated in 1,968 Black and White children ages 6-14 years, using methods similar to those used to develop the current FITNESSGRAM standards. Multiple regression was employed to develop age-, sex-, and race-specific BMI standards. Percent agreement and modified kappa (kq) were used to evaluate agreement with the %BF standards, and sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate classification accuracy. Concludes that Race-specific BMI standards appear to be a more accurate representation of unhealthy %BF levels than the current FITNESSGRAM BMI standards.
Creators(s): |
Rowe, D.A. ![]() | Item type: | Article |
---|---|
ID code: | 5458 |
Keywords: | race, physical activity, fitness, health, Communities. Classes. Races, Personal health and hygiene, including exercise, nutrition , Physiology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine |
Subjects: | Social Sciences > Communities. Classes. Races Medicine > Public aspects of medicine > Personal health and hygiene, including exercise, nutrition Science > Physiology |
Department: | Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > School of Psychological Science and Health > Physical Activity for Health |
Depositing user: | Strathprints Administrator |
Date deposited: | 06 Mar 2008 |
Last modified: | 01 Jan 2021 01:30 |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/5458 |
Export data: |