Picture of boy being examining by doctor at a tuberculosis sanatorium

Understanding our future through Open Access research about our past...

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the Centre for the Social History of Health & Healthcare (CSHHH), based within the School of Humanities, and considered Scotland's leading centre for the history of health and medicine.

Research at CSHHH explores the modern world since 1800 in locations as diverse as the UK, Asia, Africa, North America, and Europe. Areas of specialism include contraception and sexuality; family health and medical services; occupational health and medicine; disability; the history of psychiatry; conflict and warfare; and, drugs, pharmaceuticals and intoxicants.

Explore the Open Access research of the Centre for the Social History of Health and Healthcare. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Image: Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust. Wellcome Collection - CC-BY.

The regulation of healthcare in the European Union : member states' discretion or a widening of EU law? Femarbel and Ottica New Line

Zahn, Rebecca (2014) The regulation of healthcare in the European Union : member states' discretion or a widening of EU law? Femarbel and Ottica New Line. Common Market Law Review, 51 (5). pp. 1521-1538.

[img]
Preview
Text (Zahn-CMLR-2014-The-regulation-of-healthcare-in-the-European-Union-member-states-discretion)
Zahn_CMLR_2014_The_regulation_of_healthcare_in_the_European_Union_member_states_discretion.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript

Download (630kB) | Preview

Abstract

In the context of healthcare, the ECJ's jurisprudence has recently been clarified and codified in Directive 2011/24/EU on patients' rights in cross-border healthcare ("Patients' Mobility Directive"). Two judgments recently issued by the ECJ make interesting reading in this regard. While the facts of Femarbel and Ottica do not bear much resemblance to each other, the judgments illustrate that the definition of what falls under the umbrella of healthcare services is not always obvious. Moreover, the cases provide a timely example of attempts by commercial interest groups to use EU law to open up domestic healthcare markets to private, commercial service providers. As such, the judgments have the potential to provide more clarity on the scope of the Directive 2006/123 on services in the internal market ("the Services Directive") and Member States' discretion in regulating healthcare provision in their territory. Finally, the judgments provide further examples of the ECJ's willingness to adjudicate in cases concerning wholly internal situations.