Comparison of models for estimation of long-term exposure to air pollution in cohort studies

Beverland, Iain and Robertson, Charles and Yap, Christina and Heal, M.R. and Cohen, G.R. and Henderson, Deborah Elizabeth Jayne and Hart, C.L. and Agius, R.M. (2012) Comparison of models for estimation of long-term exposure to air pollution in cohort studies. Atmospheric Environment, 62. pp. 530-539. ISSN 1352-2310 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.001)

Full text not available in this repository.Request a copy

Abstract

This study compared three spatio-temporal models for estimation of exposure to air pollution throughout the central part of Scotland during 1970-79 for approximately 21,600 individuals in 2 closely-related prospective cohort studies. Although 181 black smoke (BS) monitoring sites operated in this region at some point during 1970-79, a substantial amount of BS exposure data was missing at many sites. The three exposure estimation methods were: (i) area-based regression models to impute missing data followed by assignment of exposure by inverse distance weighting of observed BS at nearby monitoring sites (IDWBS); (ii) area-based regression models to impute missing data followed by a spatial regression additive model using four local air quality predictors (LAQP): altitude; distance to the nearest major road; household density within a 250 m buffer zone; and distance to the edge of urban boundary (AMBS); (iii) a multilevel spatio-temporal model using LAQP (MultiBS). The three methods were evaluated using maps of predicted BS, and cross validation using monitored and imputed BS at sites with ≥ 80% data. The use of LAQP in the AMBS and MultiBS exposure models provided spatial patterns in BS consistent with known sources of BS associated with major roads and the centre of urban areas. Cross-validation analyses demonstrated that the MultiBS model provided more precise predictions (R2 = 60%) of decadal geometric mean BS concentrations at monitoring sites compared with the IDWBS and AMBS models (R2 of 19% and 20%, respectively).

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)