Evans v United Kingdom : what implications for the jurisprudence of pregnancy?

Ford, Mary (2008) Evans v United Kingdom : what implications for the jurisprudence of pregnancy? Human Rights Law Review, 8 (1). pp. 171-184. ISSN 1461-7781 (https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngm041)

Abstract

The recent case of Evans v United Kingdom1 documents a personal tragedy for Natallie Evans and an unenviable moral dilemma for her former partner, Howard Johnston, but for lawyers and academic commentators the decisions of the courts in the case have also presented a rare opportunity to analyse the operation of human rights provisions in the arena of what were once called ‘new reproductive technologies’, and—as will be demonstrated here—to build on this analysis to reappraise wider debates about the rights and relationships surrounding reproduction.

• Share and Export
  

  RDF+XMLBibTeXRIOXX2 XMLRDF+N-TriplesJSONDublin CoreAtomSimple MetadataReferMETSHTML CitationASCII CitationOpenURL ContextObjectEndNoteOpenURL ContextObject in SpanMODSMPEG-21 DIDLEP3 XMLData Cite XMLRIS (EndNote Online, Zotero, Ref manager, etc)RDF+N3Multiline CSV
• Item metadata

  Item type:	Article
  ID code:	33181
  Dates:	Date Event 2008 Published 10 January 2008 Published Online
  Subjects:	Medicine > Public aspects of medicine > Forensic Medicine. Medical jurisprudence. Legal medicine
  Department:	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Strathclyde Law School > Law
  Depositing user:	Pure Administrator
  Date deposited:	13 Sep 2011 11:21
  Last modified:	08 Apr 2024 19:22
  URI:	https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/33181