Picture of athlete cycling

Open Access research with a real impact on health...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde's Open Access research outputs. Strathprints provides access to thousands of Open Access research papers by Strathclyde researchers, including by researchers from the Physical Activity for Health Group based within the School of Psychological Sciences & Health. Research here seeks to better understand how and why physical activity improves health, gain a better understanding of the amount, intensity, and type of physical activity needed for health benefits, and evaluate the effect of interventions to promote physical activity.

Explore open research content by Physical Activity for Health...

What title: Why title to seek orders such as contact orders is not confined to those entitled to apply for an order conferring parental rights

Norrie, Kenneth (2004) What title: Why title to seek orders such as contact orders is not confined to those entitled to apply for an order conferring parental rights. Journal of the Law Society of Scotland, 49 (10). pp. 22-23. ISSN 0458-8711

Full text not available in this repository. Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

Scottish courts have traditionally preferred to deal with questions of parental responsibilities and parental rights in a substantive rather than technical manner.The Court of Session eschewed the use of onus, for example, in favour of the real issue of the child's welfare in White v White 2001 SC 689. Another technicality which ought, in my view, to be avoided is title to seek an order relating to parental responsibilities or parental rights. Before the coming into force of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 questions of title arose fairly frequently in the context of whether grandparents, or exparents after adoption, could seek access to their grandchild or exchild (see, for example F v F 1991 SLT 357; D v Grampian Regional Council 1995 SLT 519). Since the 1995 Act, this question continues to trouble the court, not so much on the point of principle but due to the structure of section 11 itself.