Strathprints logo
Strathprints Home | Open Access | Browse | Search | User area | Copyright | Help | Library Home | SUPrimo

Assumptions, assertions and the need for evidence: debugging debates about knowledge workers

Darr, A. and Warhurst, C. (2008) Assumptions, assertions and the need for evidence: debugging debates about knowledge workers. Current Sociology, 56 (1). pp. 25-45. ISSN 0011-3921

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

Despite growing interest in the knowledge economy, the work practice of its key workers has remained neglected. This article reviews the key sociological and managerial debates about ascendant knowledge workers. The authors argue that both debates assume, rather than empirically examine, changing work practices and through a leap of faith move on to discuss the enhanced class position of knowledge workers and the managerial challenges that they pose. The authors postulate that omission of work practice undermines such claims. They critique both debates, presenting an alternative, empirically sensitive research agenda to help overcome the existing analytical myopia.

Item type: Article
ID code: 8934
Keywords: class position, knowledge workers, work practice, human resources management, Management. Industrial Management, Sociology and Political Science
Subjects: Social Sciences > Industries. Land use. Labor > Management. Industrial Management
Department: Strathclyde Business School > Human Resource Management
Related URLs:
    Depositing user: Strathprints Administrator
    Date Deposited: 23 Oct 2009 15:14
    Last modified: 04 Sep 2014 21:18
    URI: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/8934

    Actions (login required)

    View Item