Picture of virus under microscope

Research under the microscope...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs.

Strathprints serves world leading Open Access research by the University of Strathclyde, including research by the Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences (SIPBS), where research centres such as the Industrial Biotechnology Innovation Centre (IBioIC), the Cancer Research UK Formulation Unit, SeaBioTech and the Centre for Biophotonics are based.

Explore SIPBS research

Re-examining the consumption-wealth relationship: the role of model uncertainty

Koop, Gary and Potter, Simon M. and Strachan, Rodney W. (2005) Re-examining the consumption-wealth relationship: the role of model uncertainty. Working paper. University of Leicester.

[img]
Preview
PDF (strathprints007743.pdf)
strathprints007743.pdf

Download (311kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper discusses the consumption-wealth relationship. Following the recent influential work of Lettau and Ludvigson [e.g. Lettau and Ludvigson (2001), (2004)], we use data on consumption, assets and labor income and a vector error correction framework. Key �ndings of their work are that consumption does respond to permanent changes in wealth in the expected manner, but that most changes in wealth are transitory and have no e¤ect on consumption. We investigate the robustness of these results to model uncertainty and argue for the use of Bayesian model averaging. We �nd that there is model uncertainty with regards to the number of cointegrating vectors, the form of deterministic components, lag length and whether the cointegrating residuals a¤ect consumption and income directly. Whether this uncertainty has important empirical implications depends on the researcher's attitude towards the economic theory used by Lettau and Ludvigson. If we work with their model, our �ndings are very similar to theirs. However, if we work with a broader set of models and let the data speak, we obtain somewhat di¤erent results. In the latter case, we �nd that the exact magnitude of the role of permanent shocks is hard to estimate precisely. Thus, although some support exists for the view that their role is small, we cannot rule out the possibility that they have a substantive role to play.