Picture of virus under microscope

Research under the microscope...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs.

Strathprints serves world leading Open Access research by the University of Strathclyde, including research by the Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences (SIPBS), where research centres such as the Industrial Biotechnology Innovation Centre (IBioIC), the Cancer Research UK Formulation Unit, SeaBioTech and the Centre for Biophotonics are based.

Explore SIPBS research

An empirical validation of modelling solar gains through a glazing unit using building energy simulation programs

Loutzenhiser, P.G. and Manz, H. and Strachan, P.A. and Felsmann, C. and Frank, T. and Maxwell, G.M. and Oelhafen, P. (2006) An empirical validation of modelling solar gains through a glazing unit using building energy simulation programs. HVAC and R Research, 12 (4). pp. 1097-1116. ISSN 1078-9669

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

Empirical validation of building energy simulation tools is an important component in assessing the reliability of the simulation software. An experiment performed in conjunction with the International Energy Agency's Task 34/Annex 43 was used to assess the performance of four building energy simulation codes used to model an outdoor test cell with a glazing unit. The experiment was run for a 20-day period during October 2004, and experimental cooling powers were compared with predictions from (1) EnergyPlus, (2) DOE-2.1E, (3) TRNSYS-TUD, and (4) ESP-r. Detailed code inputs for optical and thermophysical properties as well as the impact of thermal bridges were quantified through experiments and simulations; numerous statistical parameters and sensitivity analyses were implemented to facilitate a thorough comparison of predicted and experimental cooling powers. The mean percentage differences for all four codes were: 1.9% for EnergyPlus, −3.6% for DOE-2.1E, −6.2% for TRNSYS-TUD, and 3.1% for ESP-r. The implications of various modeling procedures as well as a detailed discussion of the results are provided, specifically concerning the sensitivity of the code cooling power predictions to the selection of convective heat transfer coefficients and algorithms.