Picture of athlete cycling

Open Access research with a real impact on health...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde's Open Access research outputs. Strathprints provides access to thousands of Open Access research papers by Strathclyde researchers, including by researchers from the Physical Activity for Health Group based within the School of Psychological Sciences & Health. Research here seeks to better understand how and why physical activity improves health, gain a better understanding of the amount, intensity, and type of physical activity needed for health benefits, and evaluate the effect of interventions to promote physical activity.

Explore open research content by Physical Activity for Health...

Validation of thigh-based accelerometer estimates of postural allocation in 5-12 year-olds

van Loo, Christiana M.T. and Okely, Anthony D. and Batterham, Marijka J. and Hinkley, Trina and Ekelund, Ulf and Brage, Søren and Reilly, John J. and Jones, Rachel and Janssen, Xanne and Cliff, Dylan P. (2016) Validation of thigh-based accelerometer estimates of postural allocation in 5-12 year-olds. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. ISSN 1878-1861 (In Press)

[img] Text (van-Loo-etal-JSMS2016-Validation-of-thigh-based-accelerometer-estimates)
van_Loo_etal_JSMS2016_Validation_of_thigh_based_accelerometer_estimates.pdf - Accepted Author Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 6 August 2017.
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 logo

Download (611kB) | Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

Objectives: To validate activPAL3TM (AP3) for classifying postural allocation, estimating time spent in postures and examining the number of breaks in sedentary behaviour (SB) in 5-12 year-olds. Design: Laboratory-based validation study. Methods: Fifty-seven children completed 15 sedentary, light- and moderate-to-vigorous intensity activities. Direct observation (DO) was used as the criterion measure. The accuracy of AP3 was examined using a confusion matrix, equivalence testing, Bland-Altman procedures and a paired t-test for 5-8y and 9-12y. Results: Sensitivity of AP3 was 86.8%, 82.5% and 85.3% for sitting/lying, standing, and stepping, respectively, in 5-8y and 95.3%, 81.5% and 85.1%, respectively, in 9-12y. Time estimates of AP3 were equivalent to DO for sitting/lying in 9-12y and stepping in all ages, but not for sitting/lying in 5-12y and standing in all ages. Underestimation of sitting/lying time was smaller in 9-12y (1.4%, limits of agreement [LoA]: -13.8-11.1%) compared to 5-8y (12.6%, LoA: -39.8-14.7%). Underestimation for stepping time was small (5-8y: 6.5%, LoA: -18.3-5.3%; 9-12y: 7.6%, LoA: -16.8-1.6%). Considerable overestimation was found for standing (5-8y: 36.8%, LoA: -16.3-89.8%; 9-12y: 19.3%, LoA: -1.6-36.9%). SB breaks were significantly overestimated (5-8y: 53.2%, 9-12y: 28.3%, p<0.001). Conclusions: AP3 showed acceptable accuracy for classifying postures, however estimates of time spent standing were consistently overestimated and individual error was considerable. Estimates of sitting/lying were more accurate for 9-12y. Stepping time was accurately estimated for all ages. SB breaks were significantly overestimated, although the absolute difference was larger in 5-8y. Surveillance applications of AP3 would be acceptable, however, individual level applications might be less accurate.