Murray, G. (2005) Disciplinary challenges. Critical perspectives. ARQ - Architectural Research Quarterly, 9 (1). ISSN 1474-0516
Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1359135505000023
Abstract
At the Research Seminar held at the riba on 9 September (see Report, pp13-15), Alan Penn presented the next rae exercise as a creative vehicle by which the diversity of research and architecture could be acknowledged and consolidated as a basis for self-understanding. In principle, this is a good idea. However, it implies something of a common disciplinary understanding, as against the previous regime, where schools pursued different approaches within the loose framework of the riba assessment of design quality.
| Item type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ID code: | 5629 |
| Keywords: | architecture education, research, research assessment exercise, Higher Education, Architecture |
| Subjects: | Education > Theory and practice of education > Higher Education Fine Arts > Architecture |
| Department: | Faculty of Engineering > Architecture |
| Related URLs: | |
| Depositing user: | Strathprints Administrator |
| Date Deposited: | 16 May 2008 |
| Last modified: | 12 Mar 2012 10:43 |
| URI: | http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/5629 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |