Picture of scraped petri dish

Scrape below the surface of Strathprints...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs. Explore world class Open Access research by researchers at Strathclyde, a leading technological university.

Explore

How convincing is alternative assessment for use in higher education?

Maclellan, Effie (2004) How convincing is alternative assessment for use in higher education? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (3). pp. 311-321. ISSN 0260-2938

[img]
Preview
PDF (strathprints005512.pdf)
strathprints005512.pdf

Download (88kB) | Preview

Abstract

The current preference for alternative assessment has been partly stimulated by recent evidence on learning which points to the importance of students' active engagement in the learning process. While alternative assessment may well fulfil the aims of formative assessment, its value in the summative assessment required in higher education is more problematic. If alternative assessment devices are to be used for summative purposes, the validity of alternative assessment has to be considered. The paper argues that task specification and marking consistency in alternative assessment can make comparability of performance difficult to effect, thereby leaving alternative assessment a less than convincing form for use in higher education