Strathprints Home | Open Access | Browse | Search | User area | Copyright | Help | Library Home | SUPrimo

Measured versus reported parental height

Cizmecioglu, F. and Doherty, A. and Paterson, W.F. and Young, D. and Donaldson, M.D.C. (2005) Measured versus reported parental height. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90 (9). pp. 941-942. ISSN 0003-9888

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

Parental height data are essential in the assessment of linear growth in children. A number of studies have documented inaccuracy in self-reported adult height. Two hundred parents (100 males; 100 females), mean (range) age 37.8 (20.8-69.3) years, were measured. Males overestimated height, with mean (SD) RHt-MHt 1.09 (1.96) cm, while females reported height relatively accurately, with RHt-MHt -0.09 (2.37) cm. The hypothesis that males overestimate height is confirmed. While the hypothesis that women underestimate is not supported, we recommend accurate measurement of both parents, given the considerable degree of individual variation in RHt-MHt for both sexes.

Item type: Article
ID code: 4604
Keywords: parental height, self-reported height, height measurement, genetic height potential, height, statisticsl modelling science, measured versus reported, Probabilities. Mathematical statistics, Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Subjects: Science > Mathematics > Probabilities. Mathematical statistics
Department: Faculty of Science > Mathematics and Statistics
Related URLs:
    Depositing user: Strathprints Administrator
    Date Deposited: 06 Nov 2007
    Last modified: 04 Sep 2014 16:24
    URI: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/4604

    Actions (login required)

    View Item