Picture of person typing on laptop with programming code visible on the laptop screen

World class computing and information science research at Strathclyde...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde's Open Access research outputs. Strathprints provides access to thousands of Open Access research papers by University of Strathclyde researchers, including by researchers from the Department of Computer & Information Sciences involved in mathematically structured programming, similarity and metric search, computer security, software systems, combinatronics and digital health.

The Department also includes the iSchool Research Group, which performs leading research into socio-technical phenomena and topics such as information retrieval and information seeking behaviour.

Explore

Accuracy of a freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee replacement

Smith, Julie R. and Riches, Philip E. and Rowe, Philip J. (2014) Accuracy of a freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee replacement. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 10 (2). pp. 162-169.

Full text not available in this repository. Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

Unicondylar knee replacement is technically challenging and malalignment of the implant results in high failure rates. Surgical robotics with navigation is a potential solution. The accuracy of performing unicondylar knee replacement using a freehand sculpting, semi active robotic tool was investigated using twenty synthetic femur and tibia. The resultant cut surface was compared to the intra operative planned surface. Resultant femoral and tibial implant placement was compared to the planned implant position. The maximum overcut or undercut was 2.5mm. The mean femoral and tibial surfaces showed a slight undercut (0.14mm and 0.20mm). The maximum rotational error was 3.2o and RMS angular error was 1.46o across all orientations. The maximum translational error was 1.18mm and the RMS translational error across all directions was 0.61mm. The tool produced accurate implant placement with small errors comparable to those reported by other robotic assistive devices on the market.