Picture of a black hole

Strathclyde Open Access research that creates ripples...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde's Open Access research outputs. Strathprints provides access to thousands of research papers by University of Strathclyde researchers, including by Strathclyde physicists involved in observing gravitational waves and black hole mergers as part of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) - but also other internationally significant research from the Department of Physics. Discover why Strathclyde's physics research is making ripples...

Strathprints also exposes world leading research from the Faculties of Science, Engineering, Humanities & Social Sciences, and from the Strathclyde Business School.

Discover more...

Rationalities for decision taking

Dörfler, V. (2005) Rationalities for decision taking. Strategijski menadzment, 10 (1-2). pp. 59-64. ISSN 0354-8414

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

In the present paper the reasoning of the decision taker is investigated. Different ways of reasoning of decision taker are based on different rationalities and they lead to different results. Total rationality results in optimal solution, bounded rationality results in satisfactory solution and the intuitive rationality results in objectionless solution. The first result of the present paper is to show that the solutions of the bounded and intuitive rationality will be the same for a particular person, at a particular moment, in a particular situation; so the accepted solution is satisfactory and objectionless. Bargaining leads to equitable solution. For a long while we have searched for the rationality, which results in equitable solution. In this paper I exit this reference system for the investigation of the process of bargaining to show that bargaining does not have a distinguished rationality. The equitable solution is too satisfactory and objectionless.