Picture of smart phone in human hand

World leading smartphone and mobile technology research at Strathclyde...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde's Open Access research outputs. Strathprints provides access to thousands of Open Access research papers by University of Strathclyde researchers, including by Strathclyde researchers from the Department of Computer & Information Sciences involved in researching exciting new applications for mobile and smartphone technology. But the transformative application of mobile technologies is also the focus of research within disciplines as diverse as Electronic & Electrical Engineering, Marketing, Human Resource Management and Biomedical Enginering, among others.

Explore Strathclyde's Open Access research on smartphone technology now...

Technology-driven and model-driven approaches to group decision support: Focus, research philosophy, and key concepts

Ackermann, F. and Belton, V. and Morton, Alec (2003) Technology-driven and model-driven approaches to group decision support: Focus, research philosophy, and key concepts. European Journal of Information systems, 12 (2). pp. 110-126. ISSN 0960-085X

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

There are (at least) two distinct traditions within group decision support: what we will call the 'Technology-driven' tradition, which originates in the Information Systems discipline, and what we will call the 'Model-driven' tradition, which originates in OR/MS. Although proponents of the two traditions share many of the same objectives, in the past there has been little communication between the two groups. In this paper, we describe the basic distinction between the two traditions in terms of two primary themes: research focus (i.e., what the researchers find of interest) and research philosophy and methodology (i.e., how researchers go about studying their chosen subject matter); and we trace these implications of these differences through the key concepts of each tradition. We conclude by arguing that there are many opportunities for synergy between the two traditions.