Picture of scraped petri dish

Scrape below the surface of Strathprints...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs. Explore world class Open Access research by researchers at Strathclyde, a leading technological university.

Explore

Comparison of epoch and uniaxial versus triaxial accelerometers in the measurement of physical activity in preschool children : a validation study

Hislop, Jane F. and Bulley, Catherine and Mercer, Tom H. and Reilly, John J (2012) Comparison of epoch and uniaxial versus triaxial accelerometers in the measurement of physical activity in preschool children : a validation study. Pediatric Exercise Science, 24 (3). 450 - 460. ISSN 0899-8493

[img]
Preview
PDF
12_Hislop_pes_2012_0037_450_460.pdf - Published Version

Download (273kB) | Preview

Abstract

The objectives of this Study were to explore whether triaxial is more accurate than uniaxial accelerometry and whether shorter sampling periods (epochs) are more accurate than longer epochs. Physical activity data from uniaxial and triaxial (RT3) devices were collected in 1-s epochs from 31 preschool children (15 males, 16 females, 4.4 +/- 0.8 yrs) who were videoed while they engaged in 1-hr of free-play. Video data were coded using the Children's Activity Rating Scale (CARS). A significant difference (p < .001) in the number of minutes classified as moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was found between the RT3 and the CARS (p < .002) using the cut point of relaxed walk. No significant difference was found between the GT1M and the CARS or between the RT3 and the CARS using the cut point for light jog. Shorter epochs resulted in significantly greater overestimation of MVPA, with the bias increasing from 0.7 mints at 15-s to 3.2 mins at 60-s epochs for the GT1M and 0 mins to 1.7 mins for the RT3. Results suggest that there was no advantage of a triaxial accelerometer over a uniaxial model. Shorter epochs result in significantly higher number of minutes of MVPA with smaller bias relative to direct observation