Strathprints Home | Open Access | Browse | Search | User area | Copyright | Help | Library Home | SUPrimo

Delays, demography and cycles: a forensic study

Gurney, William and Blythe, S.P. and Stokes, T.K. (1999) Delays, demography and cycles: a forensic study. Advances in Ecological Research, 28. pp. 127-144. ISSN 0065-2504

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

Strict logic implies that a hypothesis can only be proved wrong, but the main motivation of much science is to find out what is true. In this paper, we argue that the process of intuition building works by extending the classical Popperian paradigm of hypothesis and refutation to include a close relative of the legal concept of “reasonable doubt”. We believe that the way in which doubts are eroded involves building up a consistent picture over a wide ranging body of data-a process akin to the forensic investigations common in the legal process. We illustrate our argument by re-analysing A.J. Nicholson's classical data set on the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina. We conclude by discussing the implications of the investigative paradigm we describe for the design of experimental and observational programmes.

Item type: Article
ID code: 41774
Keywords: intuition, Popper, doubt, data set, Australian sheep blowfly, observational programmes, Science (General), Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Subjects: Science > Science (General)
Department: Faculty of Science > Mathematics and Statistics
Related URLs:
    Depositing user: Pure Administrator
    Date Deposited: 26 Oct 2012 15:59
    Last modified: 05 Sep 2014 18:38
    URI: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/41774

    Actions (login required)

    View Item