Strathprints Home | Open Access | Browse | Search | User area | Copyright | Help | Library Home | SUPrimo

A face for radio? How viewers and listeners reacted differently to the third leaders' debate in 2010

Shephard, M. and Johns, R. (2012) A face for radio? How viewers and listeners reacted differently to the third leaders' debate in 2010. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 14 (1). pp. 1-18. ISSN 1369-1481

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

Neil Kinnock expressed scepticism about Gordon Brown's likely showing in the 2010 election debates, suggesting that the Labour leader had a ‘radio face’. We report an experiment in which students were split randomly between audio and video conditions for the third debate. As Kinnock predicted, Gordon Brown was more often proclaimed the winner by listeners. Nick Clegg, not David Cameron, benefited most from television. These differences were statistically significant despite a small sample (n = 63). We test three explanations for Clegg's advantage: (i) that television boosts the salience of certain traits (notably attractiveness); (ii) that television boosts the importance of ‘style’ over ‘substance’; (iii) that listeners form judgements based on performance throughout the debate, while viewers are disproportionately influenced by memorable incidents or remarks. There is evidence supporting all three explanations.

Item type: Article
ID code: 40150
Keywords: elections, voting behavior, election campaigns, general election, Great Britain
Subjects: Political Science > Political institutions (Europe) > Great Britain
Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > School of Government and Public Policy > Politics
Related URLs:
    Depositing user: Pure Administrator
    Date Deposited: 21 Jun 2012 13:42
    Last modified: 29 May 2013 14:28
    URI: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/40150

    Actions (login required)

    View Item