Picture of two heads

Open Access research that challenges the mind...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs. Strathprints provides access to thousands of Open Access research papers by University of Strathclyde researchers, including those from the School of Psychological Sciences & Health - but also papers by researchers based within the Faculties of Science, Engineering, Humanities & Social Sciences, and from the Strathclyde Business School.

Discover more...

A call to alms? : natural disasters, R2P, duties of cooperation and uncharted consequences

Allan, Craig and O'Donnell, Therese (2012) A call to alms? : natural disasters, R2P, duties of cooperation and uncharted consequences. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 17 (3). pp. 337-371.

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

This article, which was initially prompted by Myanmar’s behaviour following Cyclone Nargis in May 2008, considers affected states’ responses to natural disasters, as regards the receipt of international aid-assistance. Such catastrophic phenomena provide a context for re-examining the boundaries of an affected state’s sovereign discretion, and its fettering via concepts such as Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and duties of international cooperation. Increasingly commonplace pronouncements regarding international solidarity and responsibilities toward the plight of disaster-stricken populations are reflected in the International Law Commission’s current study in this area. Part I briefly tracks post-Cold War hawkish approaches to enforcing human rights and the emergence of R2P. Part II considers the fractured nature of international disaster response law which provided the opportunity for R2P’s invocation post-Nargis. Despite its eventual, explicit, exclusion from application to natural disasters per se, Part III maintains that R2P’s rhetorical influence persisted, both in diplomatic parlance and in the current ILC Draft Articles which embolden an international cooperative duty, particularly as regards the duties of an affected state. As well as critiquing this new articulation of co-operation (especially as regards freedom to reject aid) and its supposed distinctiveness from R2P, the consequences resulting from an affected state’s dereliction of its protective duty are pondered, as is the assertion that the proposed ILC duties present no major threat to an affected state’s sovereignty.