Hermannsson, Kristinn and Lisenkova, Katerina and McGregor, Peter and Swales, John (2010) “Policy scepticism” and the impact of Northern Irish higher education institutions (HEIS) on their host region : accounting for regional budget contraints. Discussion paper. Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
10_25_UPDATE.pdf - Draft Version
Download (843kB) | Preview
This paper replicates the analysis of Scottish HEIs in Hermannsson et al (2010b) for the case of Northern Ireland. The motivation is to provide a self-contained analysis that is readily accessible by those whose primary concern is with the regional impacts of Northern Irish HEIs. A comparative analysis will follow in due course. A “policy scepticism” has emerged that challenges the results of conventional regional HEI impact analyses. This denial of the importance of the expenditure impacts of HEIs appears to be based on a belief in either a binding regional resource constraint or a regional public sector budget constraint. In this paper we provide a systematic critique of this policy scepticism. However, while rejecting the extreme form of policy scepticism, we argue that it is crucial to recognise the importance of the publicsector expenditure constraints that are binding under devolution. We show how conventional impact analyses can be augmented to accommodate regional public sector budget constraints. While our results suggest that conventional impact studies overestimate the expenditure impacts of HEIs, they also demonstrate that the policy scepticism that treats these expenditure effects as irrelevant neglects some key aspects of HEIs, in particular their export intensity.
|Item type:||Monograph (Discussion paper)|
|Keywords:||higher education institutions, input-output, Northern Ireland, impact study, Economic Theory|
|Subjects:||Social Sciences > Economic Theory|
|Department:||Strathclyde Business School > Economics|
|Depositing user:||Pure Administrator|
|Date Deposited:||15 May 2012 15:53|
|Last modified:||29 Apr 2016 10:57|