Picture of virus under microscope

Research under the microscope...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs.

Strathprints serves world leading Open Access research by the University of Strathclyde, including research by the Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences (SIPBS), where research centres such as the Industrial Biotechnology Innovation Centre (IBioIC), the Cancer Research UK Formulation Unit, SeaBioTech and the Centre for Biophotonics are based.

Explore SIPBS research

The electrical properties of filled epoxy resin systems : a comparison

Mackersie, J.W. and Given, M.J. and MacGregor, S.J. and Fouracre, R.A. (2001) The electrical properties of filled epoxy resin systems : a comparison. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE 7th International Conference on Solid Dielectrics. IEEE, pp. 125-128. ISBN 0-7803-6352-3

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

The electrical properties of an epoxy resin system for use as machine insulation containing either ZnO or Al2O3 fillers have been investigated. The fillers impart non-linear current-voltage characteristics to the materials. The electrical conductivities of plaques of epoxy containing filler were a function of the applied electric field strength. The current-voltage relationship was dependent on the filler and differed from that for the unfilled material. The current transient as a result of an applied DC step voltage depended on the filler type and applied field strength. Multi-layer, plaque samples of mica-paper, glass-cloth and epoxy resin, with and without ZnO filler, were examined electrically. Current transient measurements allowed the estimation of the dielectric loss from ~10-5-10-1 Hz. Global thermally stimulated depolarisation current (TSDC) spectra were obtained. Partial polarisation spectra at 5°C intervals were also obtained from 35-150°C for unfilled and 20% ZnO filled samples. The spectra showed significant differences between sample types