Picture of virus under microscope

Research under the microscope...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs.

Strathprints serves world leading Open Access research by the University of Strathclyde, including research by the Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences (SIPBS), where research centres such as the Industrial Biotechnology Innovation Centre (IBioIC), the Cancer Research UK Formulation Unit, SeaBioTech and the Centre for Biophotonics are based.

Explore SIPBS research

Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM): is there a consensus view? the results of a UK national external quality assessment scheme for antibiotic assays (UK NEQAS) questionnaire

Tobin, C.M. and Darville, J.M. and Thomson, A.H. and Sweeney, G. and Wilson, J.F. and White, L.O. (2002) Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM): is there a consensus view? the results of a UK national external quality assessment scheme for antibiotic assays (UK NEQAS) questionnaire. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 50 (5). pp. 713-718. ISSN 0305-7453

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

This study investigated vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and issues related to patient management. Questionnaires were distributed to 310 participants in the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for Antibiotic Assays. The response rate was 57.4%. The majority (76%) had an 'in-house' assay service based, almost exclusively, in the microbiology department, and a fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) was used by 97%. Almost half (48.7%) had an assay service available for 24 h/day, 7 days/week and 92.7% expected same-day results. The majority (80%) had issued guidelines for vancomycin use. A 12 hourly initial dosing regimen was used by 89%. Trough assay samples were taken <10 min before the dose by 91.5%. For post-dose assay samples, 44% took a sample at 1 h, 28% at 2 h and the remainder at 'other' times. For trough target ranges, 93% quoted <10 mg/L or 5-10 mg/L. There was no consensus with regard to post-dose assay sample times and 23 ranges were quoted. The majority (74.4%) regarded a trough level of >or=10 mg/L as 'toxic' but 13 concentrations were quoted as toxic post-dose measurements. In conclusion, there was a wide variability and poor consensus with regard to post-dose vancomycin assay sampling times, target ranges and what constituted a toxic level.