Picture of wind turbine against blue sky

Open Access research with a real impact...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs.

The Energy Systems Research Unit (ESRU) within Strathclyde's Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering is producing Open Access research that can help society deploy and optimise renewable energy systems, such as wind turbine technology.

Explore wind turbine research in Strathprints

Explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research content

Estimation of absorption and backscattering coefficients from in situ radiometric measurements: theory and validation in case 2 waters

McKee, D.J.C. and Cunningham, A. and Craig, S.E. (2003) Estimation of absorption and backscattering coefficients from in situ radiometric measurements: theory and validation in case 2 waters. Applied Optics, 42 (15). pp. 2804-2810. ISSN 1559-128X

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

A model that relates the coefficients of absorption (a) and backscattering (bb) to diffuse attenuation (Kd), radiance reflectance (RL), and the mean cosine for downward irradiance (μd) is presented. Radiance transfer simulations are used to verify the physical validity of the model for a wide range of water column conditions. Analysis of these radiance transfer simulations suggests that absorption and backscattering can be estimated with average errors of 1% and 3%, respectively, if the value of μd is known with depth. If the input data set is restricted to variables that can be derived from measurements of upward radiance (Lu) and downward irradiance (Ed), it is necessary to use approximate values of μd. Examination of three different approximation schemes for μd shows that the average error for estimating a and bb increases to ~13%. We tested the model by using measurements of Lu and Ed collected from case II waters off the west coast of Scotland. The resulting estimates of a and bb were compared with independent in situ measurements of these parameters. Average errors for the data set were of the order of 10% for both absorption and backscattering.